# tryandai.com

> AI-optimized mirror of tryandai.com containing 50 pages totalling 46,603 words of clean markdown content, structured data, and semantic HTML. Original source: https://tryandai.com. Last updated: 2026-08-08T08:07:59.727Z.

Each page is available as HTML (with JSON-LD structured data) and Markdown (text-only, ideal for LLMs and RAG).

## Homepage

- [Patent Litigation AI Workspace | &AI](/content/site-root.html): The patent litigation AI workspace for in-house counsel and litigation teams—claim charts, prior art search, and invalidity analysis at machine scale. (236 words)

## Articles & Blog Posts

- [Patent Litigation AI: The Complete Guide | &AI](/content/patent-litigation-ai/index.html): What patent litigation AI is, how it works, and how to evaluate it—covering prior art search, invalidity analysis, claim charts, and infringement detection. (910 words)
- [&AI vs NLPatent: Litigation Work Product vs Search | &AI](/content/compare/and-ai-vs-nlpatent/index.html): &AI vs NLPatent: how a litigation-built workspace compares to a patent-specific AI search and analysis platform on prior art, invalidity, and trial-ready charts. (533 words)
- [Claim Charts: What They Are & How AI Generates Them | &AI](/content/ai-claim-charts/index.html): What a claim chart is and how AI claim chart generators build invalidity and evidence-of-use charts, with scored, pinpoint citations you review before export. (1,039 words)
- [&AI vs Patlytics: Patent Litigation AI Compared (2026) | &AI](/content/compare/and-ai-vs-patlytics/index.html): &AI vs Patlytics for patent litigation: how a litigation-built workspace compares to a full patent-lifecycle platform on prior art, invalidity, charts, and infringement. (606 words)
- [&AI vs PatSnap: Patent Litigation AI Compared (2026) | &AI](/content/compare/and-ai-vs-patsnap/index.html): &AI vs PatSnap for patent litigation: how a litigation-built workspace compares to an AI-native innovation and IP intelligence platform on prior art, invalidity, and trial-ready charts. (657 words)
- [Best Patent Litigation AI Tools (2026) | &AI](/content/best-patent-litigation-ai-tools/index.html): How to choose patent litigation AI software in 2026: the criteria that matter, the categories of tools available, and how to tell litigation platforms from drafting tools. (534 words)
- [&AI vs IPRally: Patent Litigation vs Patent Search | &AI](/content/compare/and-ai-vs-iprally/index.html): &AI vs IPRally: how a litigation-built workspace compares to an AI-native patent search and intelligence platform on prior art, invalidity, and trial-ready charts. (513 words)
- [&AI vs IP Copilot: Litigation Work Product vs IP Management | &AI](/content/compare/and-ai-vs-ip-copilot/index.html): &AI vs IP Copilot: how a litigation work-product workspace compares to an IP-management platform that also offers prior art and infringement search. (634 words)
- [&AI vs Solve Intelligence: Patent Litigation AI | &AI](/content/compare/and-ai-vs-solve-intelligence/index.html): &AI vs Solve Intelligence: how a litigation-built workspace compares to a drafting- and prosecution-first patent AI platform on prior art, invalidity, and charts. (605 words)
- [Compare Patent Litigation AI Platforms | &AI](/content/compare/index.html): Compare &AI with leading patent AI platforms across litigation workflows, prior art search, invalidity analysis, claim charts, and product scope. (354 words)
- [&AI vs Stilta: Agentic Patent Litigation AI Compared | &AI](/content/compare/and-ai-vs-stilta/index.html): &AI vs Stilta: two agentic patent litigation AI tools compared on prior art search, invalidity, claim charts, infringement, and track record. (657 words)
- [&AI for Law Firms | Trial-Ready Patent Work at Machine Scale | &AI](/content/solutions/law-firms/index.html): From Am Law 100 to IP boutiques—discover prior art, generate claim charts, draft contentions, and pitch clients with &AI's patent litigation workspace. (349 words)
- [In-House Patent Litigation AI for IP Teams | &AI](/content/solutions/in-house/index.html): Litigation prep, infringement mining, and transactions—search patents/NPL/products, generate EOU charts, and draft positions faster with &AI. (340 words)
- [Scott Flanz Joins &AI's Advisory Board](/content/blog/scott-flanz-advisory-board/index.html): Fish & Richardson Principal Scott Flanz joins &AI's Advisory Board, bringing trial and appellate experience across federal courts, the ITC, and the PTAB. (833 words, Jul 21, 2026)
- [Harvey, Legora, ChatGPT, or &AI for Patent Work?](/content/blog/ai-for-patent-work-generic-vs-purpose-built/index.html): Can you use ChatGPT, Claude, Harvey, or Legora for patent work? Where general AI falls short for patents, and how purpose-built &AI compares. (1,325 words, Jul 5, 2026)
- [Ironburg v. Valve: Skilled-Searcher IPR Estoppel](/content/blog/ironburg-valve-skilled-searcher-ipr-estoppel/index.html): Ironburg v. Valve raises the evidentiary bar for § 315(e)(2) estoppel: accessibility isn't findability, and hindsight-tainted searches don't count. (1,322 words, Jul 3, 2026)
- [Claim Chart Annotation for Infringement Analysis | &AI](/content/blog/automated-figure-annotation-claim-charts/index.html): How automated, source-grounded figure annotation sharpens evidence-of-use charts and infringement analysis. (1,074 words, Jul 2, 2026)
- [When a Provisional Can't Carry Priority (Enanta v. Pfizer)](/content/blog/enanta-pfizer-provisional-priority-date-written-description.html): Enanta v. Pfizer shows how a single carbon cost a patent its priority date. What the §112 written-description ruling means for litigators—and how to catch it. (1,272 words, Jul 1, 2026)
- [AI Patent Infringement Detection: Evidence of Use at Scale](/content/blog/ai-patent-infringement-detection/index.html): How AI detects which products infringe a patent portfolio and finds evidence of use at scale, plus what to look for in an infringement detection tool. (1,232 words, Jun 30, 2026)
- [&AI Advisors Named to Lawdragon's 500 Leading IP Lawyers](/content/blog/lawdragon-2026-leading-global-ip-lawyers-advisors/index.html): &AI advisors Tigran Guledjian and Charles Calkins have been named to Lawdragon's 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers for 2026. (463 words, Jun 26, 2026)
- [Is AI Safe for Confidential Patent Work?](/content/blog/is-ai-safe-for-confidential-patent-work/index.html): Whether AI is safe for confidential, privileged patent work, the real risks, and the security questions every IP team should ask a vendor. (1,095 words, Jun 25, 2026)
- [Patlytics Alternatives for Patent Litigation (2026) | &AI](/content/blog/patlytics-alternatives-patent-litigation-2026/index.html): Compare Patlytics vs. 9 patent AI alternatives—&AI, Stilta, and more—on litigation fit, claim-chart depth, evidence sources, and pricing visibility. (2,772 words, Jun 24, 2026)
- [Patent Enforcement Is Becoming a Routing Problem](/content/blog/patent-enforcement-routing-problem/index.html): Patent litigation is shifting from single-forum enforcement to global routing across damages, injunctions, FRAND, PTAB, ITC, UPC, and trade secrets. (2,007 words, Jun 23, 2026)
- [Hikma v. Amarin: Foreseeability ≠ Induced Infringement](/content/blog/hikma-v-amarin-induced-infringement/index.html): In Hikma v. Amarin, a unanimous Supreme Court held that foreseeing infringing use isn't active inducement under §271(b), reversing the Federal Circuit. (1,434 words, Jun 20, 2026)
- [Best AI Prior Art Search Tools for Litigators (2026)](/content/blog/best-ai-prior-art-search-tools/index.html): Compare the best AI prior art search tools for patent litigation in 2026 — coverage, citations, charting, and how AI stacks up against search firms. (1,784 words, Jun 17, 2026)
- [How Litigators Draft Submission-Ready Claim Charts | &AI](/content/blog/how-patent-litigators-draft-submission-ready-claim-charts.html): &AI's 65 chart-formatting controls—limitation labels, Bluebook citations, screenshots, and layout—take claim charts from export to filing with no edits in Word. (894 words, May 11, 2026)
- [Why &AI Uses a Hybrid, Credit-Based Pricing Model](/content/blog/and-ai-credit-based-pricing-model/index.html): &AI uses a hybrid, credit-based pricing model—a subscription for predictability plus usage-based credits—that maps to how patent work actually flows. (1,090 words, Apr 20, 2026)
- [Ben Herbert Joins the &AI Advisory Board](/content/blog/ben-herbert-advisory-board/index.html): Procopio IP litigation partner Ben Herbert—$1.5B in patent and trade secret verdicts and a Federal Circuit clerkship—joins &AI's Advisory Board. (543 words, Apr 12, 2026)
- [Jason Mueller Joins the &AI Advisory Board](/content/blog/jason-mueller-advisory-board/index.html): Jason Mueller, IP partner at Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease and co-chair of its trademark and copyright teams, joins &AI's Advisory Board. (417 words, Mar 30, 2026)
- [Opportunities for Patent Litigation Business Development](/content/blog/announcing-opportunities-for-patent-litigation-business-development.html): &AI Opportunities brings AI case matching, patent analytics, and LinkedIn intelligence to patent litigation teams to find and win new business in minutes. (1,117 words, Mar 5, 2026)
- [Building Patent Family Graphs From Imperfect Data](/content/blog/building-patent-family-graphs-from-imperfect-data/index.html): How we built &AI's patent family visualization—pulling from multiple data sources to assemble the full graph from a single application number. (1,092 words, Feb 19, 2026)
- [Novo Nordisk Sues Hims Over Semaglutide Patent | &AI](/content/blog/novo-nordisk-sues-hims-for-patent-infringement-over-compounded-semaglutide.html): Novo Nordisk filed a patent infringement suit against Hims & Hers over compounded semaglutide, escalating from trademark to patent claims. Full case analysis. (1,108 words, Feb 18, 2026)
- [How to Evaluate AI for Patent Work | &AI Insights](/content/blog/how-to-evaluate-ai-for-patent-work/index.html): A patent-specific framework for evaluating AI: workflow selection, accuracy measurement, ROI calculation, and vendor alignment for patent teams. (1,348 words, Feb 17, 2026)
- [Automated Prosecution History Analysis | &AI](/content/blog/how-and-ai-transforms-prosecution-history-analysis/index.html): Every claim version redlined, every change linked to its source. &AI automates prosecution history assembly so patent litigators can focus on analysis. (895 words, Feb 9, 2026)
- [Agent Swarms: The AI Architecture Reshaping Patent Work](/content/blog/agent-swarms-are-coming-to-patent-work/index.html): Opus 4.6, GPT-5.3 Codex, and Cursor's agent swarms are running complex tasks for days without human intervention. Here's what that means for patent work. (1,095 words, Feb 6, 2026)
- [Litigation-Grade Patent Parsing | &AI](/content/blog/how-and-ai-solved-patent-parsing/index.html): Learn how &AI transforms patent PDFs into structured, citable data. Line detection, figure indexing, and thousands of regression tests—built for litigation. (1,646 words, Feb 4, 2026)
- [Best AI for Patent Litigation & Post-Grant Work (2026)](/content/blog/ai-for-post-grant-and-patent-litigation-in-2026/index.html): Purpose-built vs. bolted-on: why platform origin matters for patent litigators. Compare &AI, Patlytics, and Solve for IPR and district court work. (1,590 words, Feb 1, 2026)
- [Federal Circuit Affirms Pre-Trial § 101 Win for Google | &AI](/content/blog/federal-circuit-affirms-pre-trial-101-win-for-google.html): The Federal Circuit affirms a pre-trial § 101 dismissal for Google, holding the asserted patent claims ineligible. Key takeaways for patent litigators. (987 words, Jan 30, 2026)
- [Lawyers Are Vibe Coding. What It Means for Legal Tech](/content/blog/lawyers-are-vibe-coding/index.html): Lawyers are building AI tools through vibe coding. Learn when to build vs buy legal tech, plus resources to start prototyping your own solutions. (1,120 words, Jan 29, 2026)
- [83% complete claim charts in minutes | &AI](/content/blog/claim-charts-in-minutes/index.html): Generate patent claim charts in minutes with AI. Create invalidity and evidence-of-use charts faster—without losing control. (761 words, Jan 27, 2026)
- [2026 Predictions for Legal AI | &AI](/content/blog/2026-predictions-for-legal-ai/index.html): Top legal tech predictions for 2026: AI adoption, workflow automation, and emerging tools reshaping how law firms and IP teams operate. (854 words, Jan 22, 2026)
- [Is AI in Legal Workflows Becoming Table Stakes?](/content/blog/is-ai-in-legal-workflows-becoming-table-stakes/index.html): AI in legal workflows is shifting from competitive advantage to baseline expectation. Learn why law firms and legal teams must adapt now. (839 words, Jan 20, 2026)
- [&AI is now generally available | &AI](/content/blog/public-access-announcement/index.html): &AI is now generally available with transparent, credit-based pricing—built for patent litigation workflows like search, claim charts, drafting, and tables. (953 words, Nov 6, 2025)
- [&AI raises $6.5M seed and introduces Andy | &AI](/content/blog/seed-funding-announcement/index.html): &AI announces $6.5M seed funding and introduces Andy, our AI patent analyst. Learn how we're transforming patent workflows for IP teams. (457 words, Feb 6, 2025)

## Products

- [AI Prior Art Search Tool](/content/product/prior-art-search/index.html): Replace prior art search firms. Search patents, NPL, product documentation, archived web, and clinical trials in seconds—then export evidence-ready results. (788 words)
- [Business Development for Patent Litigators](/content/product/business-development/index.html): Opportunities is &AI's real-time feed of patent litigation filings, personalized to you and your team with memory of your prior work and how you like to pitch. (591 words)
- [Claim Chart Software — AI Claim Chart Generator](/content/product/claim-charts/index.html): Generate precise patent invalidity claim charts and evidence-of-use charts, with dozens of formatting settings that make your chart exports trial-ready. (778 words)
- [Patent Invalidity Analysis Software](/content/product/invalidity-analysis/index.html): Discover prior art, generate claim charts, and draft §102, §103, and §112 arguments—grounded in claim construction and full prosecution history. (621 words)
- [Patent Infringement Detection (Evidence of Use)](/content/product/infringement-detection/index.html): Mine portfolios for infringement targets, search product documentation, and generate evidence-of-use charts and (non)infringement analysis at scale. (439 words)

## Resources

- [Full Page Index](/index.html): Browse all cached pages with rich metadata
- [About This Cache](/about.html): Methodology, technical details, and usage guidelines
- [XML Sitemap](/sitemap.xml): Machine-readable sitemap for crawler discovery
- [Robots.txt](/robots.txt): Crawler directives