&AI vs Solve Intelligence: Patent Litigation AI | &AI
&AI vs Solve Intelligence
A litigation-built workspace vs. a drafting- and prosecution-first platform.
Which is better for patent litigation?
&AI is built for litigation—agentic prior art search across patents, NPL, and products, §102/§103/§112 invalidity, and trial-ready claim charts used in active IPR and district court. Solve Intelligence centers on drafting, prosecution, and invention harvesting. Choose &AI for disputes; Solve if your work centers on drafting and prosecution.
&AI vs Solve Intelligence, side by side
| Capability | &AI | Solve Intelligence |
|---|---|---|
| Primary design focus | Patent litigation and disputes | Drafting, prosecution, and invention harvesting |
| Prior art search (patents + NPL + products) | Yes — agentic, multi-pass search including products and public-use evidence | Search across patents and NPL, oriented to patentability |
| Invalidity analysis (§102 / §103 / §112) | Yes — a core workflow, end to end to a filing | Via the Charts tool (invalidity charts) |
| Trial-ready claim charts | Yes — used in active IPR and district court proceedings | Yes — Charts tool (invalidity, SEP, FTO, infringement, claim construction) |
| Infringement detection / evidence of use | Yes | Infringement mapping via the Charts tool |
| Patent drafting and prosecution | Not offered — litigation-only by design | Yes — drafting and office action responses |
| Invention harvesting / disclosure forms | Not offered | Yes |
Solve Intelligence details reflect their public materials as of 2026 and may change. Confirm current capabilities with the vendor.
Choose &AI when
Your work is disputes, not drafting
&AI is designed end to end for litigation. Its prior art search reaches beyond patents into NPL, products, and public-use evidence—the art that most often invalidates—and runs the multi-pass workflow a senior searcher would, showing its work. Results flow into invalidity analysis and trial-ready claim charts used in active IPR and district court proceedings.
Consider Solve Intelligence when
You're in Europe—or drafting is the priority
Solve Intelligence publishes EU data-residency options and GDPR-aligned controls in its public materials—requirements many European in-house and firm teams weigh heavily. If data residency is a firm constraint, it is worth comparing.
It also centers on writing and prosecuting patents—invention harvesting, application drafting in your own style, and office action responses. If prosecution is your center of gravity rather than litigation, compare it against your requirements.
Frequently asked questions
Is &AI or Solve Intelligence better for patent litigation?
&AI is built specifically for litigation—agentic prior art search across patents, NPL, and products, §102/§103/§112 invalidity, and trial-ready claim charts used in active IPR and district court. Solve Intelligence centers on drafting, prosecution, and invention harvesting, with a Charts tool that also produces invalidity and infringement charts. Choose &AI for disputes; Solve if your work centers on drafting and prosecution.
What does Solve Intelligence focus on?
Solve Intelligence centers on drafting and prosecution: invention harvesting, full and partial application drafting in your style, and office action responses with citations to the file wrapper and case law. It also offers a Charts tool.
Which is the better option for European teams?
It depends on the work. Solve Intelligence publishes EU data-residency options and GDPR-aligned controls in its public materials, which European in-house and firm teams often weigh heavily—so if data residency is a hard requirement, it is worth comparing. &AI is built for US-style patent litigation work product; teams whose center of gravity is European prosecution should weigh Solve against their requirements, while teams focused on litigation deliverables tend to prefer &AI.
Both have claim charts—how do they differ?
Solve’s Charts tool spans invalidity, SEP, FTO, infringement, and claim construction within a drafting- and prosecution-first platform. &AI’s charts are part of a litigation-first workflow: tied to agentic prior art search across patents, NPL, and products, built to be trial-ready, and used in active IPR and district court proceedings.